HOMEPRACTICE AREASOUR ATTORNEYSNEWSLETTERSDECISIONSPUBLICATIONSCONTACT USCLIENT RIGHTS/DISCLAIMER
360 Lexington Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10017
Tel 212-922-9250 Fax 212-922-9335
Newsletters 2011
Newsletters 2013
Newsletters 2012
Newsletters 2010
Newsletters 2011
Newsletters 2009
Newsletters 2008
Newsletters 2007
Newsletters 2006
Newsletters 2005
Newsletters 2003
Newsletters 2002
Newsletters 2004
Newsletters 2001
 

 

Ganfer & Shore, LLP's 2011 monthly newsletters are found below and our library of past newsletters can be accessed through the links to the left.

If you would like to receive a copy of our monthly newsletter, please click here.

December 2011-Real Estate Newsletter HTML
 
  • Five Members of Ganfer & Shore, LLP Designated as "Super Lawyers" For 2011-12
  • Court Holds That Cooperative Must Make Front Entrance, Not Just Side Entrance, Accessible
  • Offering Plans and Amendments Now Available in Digital Form

  • Five Members of Ganfer & Shore, LLP Designated as "Super Lawyers" For 2011-12
  • Court Reiterates High Standard For Obtaining A Preliminary Injunction Enforcing Non-Compete Agreement
  • Individual Corporate Officers Held Liable For FLSA Violations
  • Alleged Comments By Employer's HR Director Sufficient to Defeat Its Motion For Summary Judgment
  • EEOC Reports Record Highs In Complaints, Recoveries in FY 2011
 
 
 
  • Federal Court Allows Lawsuit to Proceed Alleging Coop Discriminates Against Single Men
  • Purchaser of Condominium Unit in Foreclosure Sale Must Pay Unpaid Common Charges Where Terms of Sale So Require
  • Reminder:  Ganfer & Shore, LLP to Host Panel and Wine-Tasting
 
 
  • New York's Wage Theft Protection Act is Given Retroactive Effect
  • Employer Settles EEOC Suit for Failing to Accomodate Employee With Dwarfism Condition
  • Court Refuses to Enforce Hair Removal Specialist Restrictive Covenant
  • SSA "No Match" Letters Are Back
 
  • Selecting A Form of Unincorporated Business Entity
  • Ganfer & Shore, LLP to Host Panel and Wine Tasting
  • Ganfer & Shore, LLP to Host Panel and Wine-Tasting
  • NLRB Requiring Employers-Union and Non-Union- to Post Notices Informing Employees of Right to Unionize
  • Owner of Ground-Floor Commercial Condominium Unit Held Responsible For Repair and Maintenance of Adjoining Sidewalk
  • New State Law Prohibits Certain Property Transfer Fees
  • Ganfer & Shore, LLP to Host Panel and Wine-Tasting
  • IRS Launches New "Voluntary Worker Classification Settlement Program" to Provide Tax Relief to Employers That Reclassify Their Wokers
  • Employee Must Meet Employers's Legitimate Job Expetactions to Sustain an Americans With Disabilities Act Claim
  • Failing to Return Phone Calls From an Employee on FMLA Leave May Constitute Retaliation
  • NLRB Postpones Date of New Posting Requirement
  • ILSA's "Improved Lot" Exemption Applies to Condominium Units, Federal Court Holds
  • Court Bars Board of "Loft Law" Cooperative From Limiting Potential Purchasers of Residential  Unit
 
  • NLRB Requires Employers-Union and Non-Union- to Post Notices Informing Employees of Right to Unionize
  • Prospective Employer Not Subject to Retaliation Claim Under FLSA
  • Employee's FMLA Claim Rejected Based on Pattern of Absences Around Holidays, Vacations, and Scheduled Days Off
  • NLRB Rules That Unauthorized Workers Cannot Receive Back Pay For Federal Labor Law Violations
  • Court Dismisses Second-Hand Smoke Case Against Neighboring Condominium Owners
  • Issues of Fact Preclude Summary Judgment on Claim For Down Payment in Aborted Co-Op Sale
  • Limited Injunction Granted Providing Tenant-Shareholder With Use of Roof Area
 
  • Attorneys' Fees Denied in FLSA Case
  • NLRB May Be Retreating in Cases Involving Employee Comments on Social Media Websites
 
  • Ganfer & Shore Obtains Appellate Rulings Favoring Condominium Board and, Real Estate Investor
  • First Department Upholds Authority of Duly Designated Condominium Board of Managers
  • Contract Signed Via E-Mail Was Not Final and Binding, Appellate Court Affirms
 
  • Federal Appeals Court Upholds Employer's Corrective Measures in Racially Hostile Work Environment Case
  • The Ongoing Battle Over Social Media:  Employer Prevail as NLRB General Counsel Upholds Discharge for Critical Tweets
  • NLRB Permits Unions to Deploy Giant Inflatable Rats Against Neutral Employers
 
  • Court Upholds Cooperative's Termination of Tenant-Shareholder's Proprietary Lease
  • Disputed Default Interest on Mortgage May Be Paid Into Escrow, Not to Lender, Court Holds
 
  • EEOC Targetting Employers' Inflexible Medical Leave of Absence Policies
  • Second Circuit Reinstates an Age Discrimination Claim
  • The Second Circuit Reinstates Overtime Claim Although Employee's Own Records Said He Did Not Work Overtime
 
  • Companies Should Ensure They Have Up-To-Date Indemnification Provisions For Directors and Officers
  • Courts Emphasize Parties' Parties' Obligations to Preserve Documents and Electronic Information When Litigation is Pending or Threatened
  • Decision Holds Attorney-Client Privilege Inapplicable in Dispute With Insurance Carrier 
 
  • Cooperative Held Liable For Child's Injuries Caused by Lead Paint in Apartment
  • "Procurement Company" Was Not Liable Under Scaffold Law, Appeals Court Affirms
  • Availabity of "Stacked" Exemptions Under ILSA to Be Determined as of When Purchase Contract Is Signed
 
  • Disparate Treatment Allows Foreign-Born Employee to Convert His Security Clearance Firing Into Bias Claim
  • NLRB Decision Increases the Risk For Non-Union Employers With "Overbroad" Employee Handbook Rules
  • "Being Left Alone" is Not a Reasonable ADA Accommodation
  • An Accommodation That Will Not Permit Employee to Perform the Essential Functions of His Job Cannot Support an ADA Claim
 
  • Condominium Board's Power to Lease Roof Space to Wireless Company Upheld
  • Discrimination Suit Against Cooperative Board Allowed to Proceed
  • New York Continues Its Fight Against Bedbugs
  • New York Adopts "Wage Theft Prevention Act"

 
April 2011-Employment Newsletter HTML

  • Supreme Court Defines "Complaint" Broadly for Purposes of Federal Anti-Retaliation Laws
  • Employer's Frequent Calls to Employee During FMLA Leave May Unlawfully Interfere With Leave
  • On the Other Hand, Employee's Failure to Return Supervisor's Phone Calls Undermines Employee's FMLA Claim
     

March 2011-Real Estate Newsletter HTML

  • Rule Against Perpetuities Does Not Apply to Lease Renewal Options
  • Lease Provision Fixing Late Fees as Percentage of Rent is Unenforceable Penalty, Court Holds
  • Wrongful Death Action Proceeds Against Cooperative Following Elevator Outage
  • Federal Court Decision Demonstrates Danger of "Self-Help" Remedies

March 2011-Employment Newsletter HTML

  • Supreme Court Holds That Company May Be Liable for Discriminatory Motives of Non-Decision-Makers
  • EEOC Issues New Regulations Barring Discrimination Based on Genetic Information

 February 2011-Real Estate Newsletter HTML

  • Alteration Provisions of Proprietary Lease Are Valid and Enforceable, Court Holds
  • Foreclosure of Cooperative Unit Put on Hold; Notices Did Not Satisfy Statutory Requirements
  • Proposed Local Law Would Regulate Cooperative Application Process

February 2011-Employment Newsletter HTML

  • New York Adopts "Wage Theft Prevention Act"
  • A New Twist on "Protected Concerted Activity" Under NLRA?
  • Interfering With Ex-Employee's Unemployment Claim is Not Retaliation Under Title VII
  • Title VII Does Not Protect Employees From "Ordinary Slings and Arrows That Suffuse the Workplace Every Day

January 11-Real Estate Newsletter HTML

  • Contractual Provision Precludes Condominium Unit Purchaser's Claim For Fraud, Court Holds
  • Purchaser of Cooperative Shares From Receiver Is Held Not to Be A Holder of Unsold Shares
  • Cooperative Board Allowed To Reject Proposed Sale of Building-Owned Apartment Based on Price

January 11-Employment Newsletter HTML

  • Federal Appeals Court Upholds Employer's Victory In Untimely Filed Discrimination Case
  • Employee Who Stole And Used Company Documents in Discrimination Case Rewarded With $10 Million Verdict
  • Employee Feeling Stress Over Business-Related Air Travel Does Not Have A Protected Disability
  • Even While Engaging in Protected Activity, Employees Must Act Civilly

January 11- Corporate Newsletter HTML

  • New York Court of Appeals Expands "In Pari Delicto" Doctrine Shielding Some Third-Party Professionals From Liability